{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award should be set aside for breach of natural justice","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant given opportunity to make submissions; arbitrator considered both parties' submissions"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator was biased or had an interest in the dispute","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator is an estate agent; applicant alleged commission benefits from high rentals"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the rental increase violated public policy","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Rental increased from market rates to US$15-20/sqm; memories of hyperinflation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, a tenant at Arundel Office Park, sought to set aside an arbitral award determining rental rates issued by the second respondent arbitrator. The applicant alleged the award violated public policy and natural justice principles.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases