Right of audienceTrade union officialLabour Court representationSection 92 Labour Act
Tags
Right of representationTrade union officialLabour Court jurisdiction
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No.20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No.20) Act 2013
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether Mr. Chisasa has right of representation before the Labour Court under Section 92 of the Labour Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Mr. Chisasa's status as union official; his dismissal from employment; requirements of Section 92"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant appealed against his dismissal by the respondent. The respondent raised a preliminary objection challenging the right of representation of the appellant's representative, Mr. Chisasa, arguing he was neither a legal practitioner nor a trade union official as required by Section 92 of the Labour Act.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases