{"issue_text":"Whether the termination was by mutual agreement or constituted retrenchment","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Parties signed mutual termination document but disputed underlying facts"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in applying damages formula instead of retrenchment package formula","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator awarded separation package using damages in lieu of reinstatement approach"}
{"issue_text":"Whether repealed provisions of Labour Act should be used to calculate package","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent argued for use of repealed 2-weeks-per-year formula"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Employee Daisy Mhlanga challenged her employer Zimasco's restructuring that made her position redundant. After refusing a lower-grade post, parties signed a mutual termination agreement but failed to agree on the separation package quantum. The matter went to arbitration where the arbitrator mischaracterised the termination as mutual agreement and applied wrong formula.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases