Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Supreme Court

Curechem Overseas (Pvt) Ltd v Vadac Properties (Pvt) Ltd

SC 71/18

Case Details

Court
Supreme Court
Date
30 October 2018
Citation
SC 71/18
Neutral Citation
[2018] ZWSC 71
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
Makoni JA
Full Bench
Garwe JAGuvava JAMakoni JA
Areas of Law
Contract LawProperty Law
Keywords
Lessee obligationsPremises repairChemical damageLoss of rental income
Tags
Lease AgreementBreach of ContractDamagesFair Wear and Tear
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • UNKNOWN
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in finding that the appellant failed to leave the premises in the ‘same good order, fair wear and tear excepted,’ taking into account the use and age of the premises.","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Chemical penetration depth, use for chemical storage, acceptance of BCHOD report, appellant’s admission of damage"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in awarding the claim for damages for loss of rental income.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"RPAZ report, five-month vacancy, tenant offers, health risks"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellant leased industrial premises from the respondent for chemical storage from 2004 to 2013. Upon termination, the respondent claimed the premises were returned in a damaged state beyond fair wear and tear due to chemical spillage, necessitating costly repairs and a five-month delay in re-letting. The High Court awarded damages for repair costs and lost rental income. The appellant appealed, arguing the damage was within fair wear and tear and that the loss was not properly mitigated.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →