Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Corisco Design Team (CODET) v Zimsun Zimbabwe (Private) Limited

HH 291-11

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
30 November 2011
Citation
HH 291-11
Neutral Citation
[2011] ZWHH 291
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
BHUNU J
Full Bench
BHUNU J
Areas of Law
Civil ProcedureContract LawPleading Rules
Keywords
Striking outRule 141Rule 187AdmissionsOral agreementMemorandum of understanding
Tags
Contract LawProfessional ServicesPleading Irregularities
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, 1971
  • High Court Rules, 1971
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether defendant's plea should be struck out for containing contradictory and irregular matter","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Defendant's contradictory paragraphs 4.7 and 7.2, and 5.5 and 5.6"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether defendant is deemed to have admitted facts by silence under Rule 187","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendant's failure to respond to notice to admit facts within ten days"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The plaintiff, a consortium of architects and engineers, claimed US$16,175,740.72 for professional services allegedly rendered under an oral agreement concluded in April 2007 for hotel development projects in Equatorial Guinea. The defendant denied entering into any binding contract and contradicted itself in its plea regarding project approvals and fee liability.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →