{"issue_text":"Whether defendant's plea should be struck out for containing contradictory and irregular matter","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Defendant's contradictory paragraphs 4.7 and 7.2, and 5.5 and 5.6"}
{"issue_text":"Whether defendant is deemed to have admitted facts by silence under Rule 187","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendant's failure to respond to notice to admit facts within ten days"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff, a consortium of architects and engineers, claimed US$16,175,740.72 for professional services allegedly rendered under an oral agreement concluded in April 2007 for hotel development projects in Equatorial Guinea. The defendant denied entering into any binding contract and contradicted itself in its plea regarding project approvals and fee liability.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases