CHIDYAUSIKU CJMALABA DCJZIYAMBI JAGWAUNZA JAGARWE JAGOWORA JAHLATSHWAYO JAPATEL JAGUVAVA JA
Areas of Law
Constitutional lawCriminal law
Keywords
Freedom of expressionCriminal CodeSection 31(a)(iii)ConstitutionalityRule nisi
Tags
Freedom of expressionCriminal lawConstitutional validity
legislation
Statutes Cited
Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe (former)
Constitution of Zimbabwe (former)
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether section 31(a)(iii) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] was in contravention of section 20(1) of the former Constitution","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The provision interferes with freedom of expression; Minister failed to show reasonable justification"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants challenged the constitutional validity of section 31(a)(iii) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act, arguing it violated the right to freedom of expression under section 20(1) of the former Constitution. The court issued a rule nisi calling upon the Minister of Justice to show cause why the provision should not be declared invalid.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases