Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Collin Nhamo Madzima v Doris Runesu Mate

HH 86-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
8 February 2017
Citation
HH 86-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 86
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Trial

Bench

Presiding
Dube J
Full Bench
Dube J
Areas of Law
Property LawContract Law
Keywords
cessionmistakevoid contractreimbursementdouble allocation
Tags
cession agreementdouble salecommon mistakeenrichment
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, 1971
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the plaintiffs paid US$7,000 to the defendant","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Payment of purchase price"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to be refunded amounts paid by the defendant","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Common mistake regarding ownership rights"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the agreement of sale and agreement of cession are void and against whom are they enforceable","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendant's lack of rights to cede"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The plaintiff purchased a stand from defendant for $7,000 in July 2010. Parties signed a cession agreement when transfer could not be effected as the stand was not fully serviced. In 2012, plaintiffs discovered the stand had been previously sold to a third party in 2006. Plaintiffs cancelled the agreement and claimed reimbursement. Defendant denied liability arguing she had ceded all her rights to plaintiffs.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →