Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

CMED PVT LTD v FIRST OIL COMPANY & 6 ORS

HH 495-13

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
18 December 2013
Citation
HH 495-13
Neutral Citation
[2013] ZWHH 495
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Tsanga J
Full Bench
Tsanga J
Areas of Law
Civil procedureCommercial law
Keywords
exceptioncause of actiondieselfuel supplymisrepresentationdelict
Tags
exceptiondiesel supplynon-deliverycause of action
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, 1971
  • High Court Rules, 1971
  • High Court Rules, 1971
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Does the summons and declaration disclose a cause of action against the third defendant?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Letter from third defendant; non-delivery of fuel; payment made"}
  • {"issue_text":"Is the third defendant liable in contract or delict for non-delivery of fuel?","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Third defendant's letter; no direct contract with plaintiff"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

CMED (plaintiff) sued multiple defendants including the third defendant (National Oil Infrastructure Company) for non-delivery of 3 million litres of diesel worth $2.7 million. The third defendant excepted to the summons arguing it disclosed no cause of action against it, relying on a letter it had written merely confirming it was holding diesel on behalf of Petrograde.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →