{"issue_text":"Whether a beneficiary can petition High Court to remove an executor under common law","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Master refused to remove appellant; first respondent sought removal"}
{"issue_text":"Whether valid grounds existed for appellant's removal as executor","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant's excessive fees; mistrust by beneficiaries; improper valuations"}
{"issue_text":"Whether appellant was entitled to 15% fees on estate assets","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant charged 10% on capital assets plus 5% on gross; claimed assets \"brought to account\""}
{"issue_text":"Whether court a quo properly granted declarator on executor fees","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Court declared future executor fees at 5%; declarator not pleaded"}
{"issue_text":"Whether costs order against appellant was justified","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant sued in official capacity; no reasons for costs order"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The late Edward Nyanyiwa died intestate on 10 February 2019, leaving a vast business empire through twelve companies. The appellant was appointed executor dative but charged excessive fees (15% total) by valuing entire company assets rather than the deceased's shareholdings, and treating these as "capital assets brought to account" for additional remuneration.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases