{"issue_text":"Whether the respondent's case had prescribed under Section 94 of the Labour Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Dismissal on 5 April 2006, referral on 4 February 2011"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the alleged appeal letter interrupted prescription","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Annexure C photocopy, no original found"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent was dismissed on 5 April 2006 for absence without reasonable cause. He allegedly referred his case to the National Employment Council on 4 February 2011, nearly 5 years later, claiming unfair labour practice. The appellant raised prescription as a defence under Section 94 of the Labour Act.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases