arbitral award appealquestion of lawfactual findingsAAZ ratesmotor vehicle benefitgross misdirection
Tags
arbitral awardappeal on question of lawAAZ ratesmotor vehicle benefit
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether grounds 2 and 3 of the appeal, raising factual issues, are competent before the Labour Court","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Grounds 2 and 3 relate to 80/20% concept and vehicle valuation"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the appellant established gross misdirection on the part of the arbitrator regarding the AAZ rates and fuel component","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Ground 1 alleges gross misdirection in applying AAZ rates"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, City of Harare, appealed against an arbitral award concerning motor vehicle benefits provided to the respondent employee. The dispute centered on whether fuel costs should be claimed separately under AAZ rates and the application of the 80/20% concept for personal use of company vehicles.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases