unfair labour practicepromotionrotational leaveencashmentarbitral awardcollective bargaining agreement
Tags
unfair labour practicepromotionrotational leaveencashmentarbitral award
legislation
Statutes Cited
Collective Bargaining Agreement: Harare Municipal Undertaking (Leave Agreement) Statutory Instrument 390 of 1992
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Did the arbitrator exceed his mandate by ordering promotion to Divisional Officer?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The unfair labour practice complained of was denial of work assignments"}
{"issue_text":"Can rotational leave days be encashed under the collective bargaining agreement?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"SI 390 of 1992 does not provide for encashment of rotational leave"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent, a firefighter employed by the appellant, alleged unfair labour practices including denial of work assignments, leave days, and rotational leave. After conciliation failed, the matter proceeded to compulsory arbitration where the arbitrator ruled in favour of the respondent, ordering promotion to Divisional Officer and encashment of rotational leave days. The appellant appealed against these specific aspects of the arbitral award.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases