{"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in finding no contributory negligence by respondent","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent ran in dark area, waved down omnibus at undesignated spot"}
{"issue_text":"Whether damages should be apportioned under s 4 of Damages (Apportionment and Assessment) Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Alleged negligence by both parties contributed to accident"}
{"issue_text":"Whether court a quo erred in ordering appellant to pay costs","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent made high initial damages claim"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent fell into an uncovered catch pit belonging to the appellant City of Harare on 28 March 2014, sustaining a broken leg and permanent disability. He claimed damages for negligence. The High Court found the City liable and awarded damages. The City appealed, arguing the respondent was contributorily negligent and damages should be apportioned.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases