{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in awarding extra duty allowance without proof respondents acted in higher grades","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No concrete evidence of acting in higher positions; arbitrator took judicial notice"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred ordering appointment to non-existent positions respondents never acted in","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Grade 10 overseer positions; respondents failed trade tests"}
{"issue_text":"Whether appeal was out of time","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Award made 3 Aug 2012; received 11 Oct 2012; appeal noted 9 Nov 2012"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondents, employees of the City of Harare, claimed they performed duties above their grades during the 2000-2009 brain drain period without receiving extra pay or promotion. An arbitrator awarded them either promotion to grade 10 overseer positions or extra duty allowance at 5% of basic salary. The appellant appealed against paragraphs 2-4 of the award.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases