{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award should be set aside for being contrary to public policy","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Non-fulfilment of suspensive conditions, contract execution without resolutions"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the contract was valid despite non-fulfilment of suspensive conditions","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Clauses 5.2 and 5.3 requiring council and board resolutions"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the penalty clause was enforceable","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Penalty clause introduced separately, no resolutions approving it"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The City of Harare sought to set aside an arbitral award that had ordered it to pay US$15 million to Augur Investments OU for termination of a construction agreement. The agreement contained suspensive conditions requiring council and board resolutions that were never fulfilled.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases