Costs and taxationLegal practiceSupreme Court procedure
Keywords
Bill of costsCorrespondentPartnerTranscription costsTaxation
Tags
Costs taxationLegal practitionersAppeal record transcription
legislation
Statutes Cited
High Court Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether a partner in a law firm can be viewed as a correspondent as to be entitled to submit a separate bill of costs for taxation","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Danziger & Partners has Gweru and Harare offices; both partners performed work"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the costs of transcription of an appeal record done by a private company should be allowed on taxation of a bill of costs","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Registrar outsourced transcription; appellant paid $1,655"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The Supreme Court previously allowed an appeal with costs. During taxation of those costs, disputes arose whether (1) a partner in a law firm can submit a separate bill as correspondent, and (2) privately-incurred transcription costs should be allowed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases