Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Labour Court

Christopher Chipembere v Anjin Investments (Pvt) Ltd

[2020] ZWLC 38

Case Details

Court
Labour Court
Date
31 January 2020
Citation
[2020] ZWLC 38
Judgment No.
LC/H/38/2020
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
Kachambwa J
Full Bench
Kachambwa J
Areas of Law
Labour procedureCourt rules compliance
Keywords
condonationnotice of responselate filingprocedural bar
Tags
condonationnotice of responseprocedural compliance
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • P
  • o
  • l
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • E
  • v
  • i
  • d
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 4
  • R
  • e
  • g
  • u
  • l
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • f
  • I
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • g
  • a
  • t
  • o
  • r
  • y
  • P
  • o
  • w
  • e
  • r
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • (
  • A
  • r
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • l
  • e
  • 6
  • )
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether respondent was improperly before court for failure to file notice of response","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent failed to file notice of response, admitted breach"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether respondent's application for condonation should be granted","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent made feeble application for condonation, application was incomplete"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellant raised a point in limine that the respondent was improperly before the court for failure to file a notice of response. Despite early reminders from the court clerk about the filing error, the respondent failed to apply for rectification and proceeded as if all was in order.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →