condonationnotice of responselate filingprocedural bar
Tags
condonationnotice of responseprocedural compliance
legislation
Statutes Cited
P
o
l
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
E
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
8
4
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
o
r
y
P
o
w
e
r
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
0
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
(
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
6
)
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether respondent was improperly before court for failure to file notice of response","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent failed to file notice of response, admitted breach"}
{"issue_text":"Whether respondent's application for condonation should be granted","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent made feeble application for condonation, application was incomplete"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant raised a point in limine that the respondent was improperly before the court for failure to file a notice of response. Despite early reminders from the court clerk about the filing error, the respondent failed to apply for rectification and proceeded as if all was in order.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases