taxation of costslitigant in personreview proceedingsdiscretion of taxing officer
Tags
taxationcostsreviewself-represented litigant
legislation
Statutes Cited
Supreme Court Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 2) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Administrative Justice Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether a self-represented litigant can claim costs for time and effort spent prosecuting a matter","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant is self-represented; claimed US$746.53 for man hours"}
{"issue_text":"Whether costs incurred at the Labour Court should be included in Supreme Court taxation","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Items 1-138 relate to Labour Court proceedings predating the appeal"}
{"issue_text":"Whether costs should be denominated in United States dollars or Zimbabwean local currency","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant insisted on USD; second respondent wanted to pay in ZWL"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, a self-represented litigant, sought review of a taxing officer's decision that disallowed various items in his bill of costs. The costs were awarded to him in a previous Supreme Court case (SC 105/20) concerning his retrenchment dispute with Old Mutual. The taxing officer disallowed claims for time spent prosecuting the appeal, costs incurred at the Labour Court, and costs denominated in USD rather than ZWL.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases