{"issue_text":"Whether plaintiff's claim had prescribed","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Cause of action arose 17 February 2011, proceedings instituted 10 January 2017"}
{"issue_text":"Whether plaintiff's claim was competent given void agreement","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Agreement declared null ab initio"}
{"issue_text":"Whether either party was unjustly enriched","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"US$5,000 restitution paid"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff purchased property from defendant in 2001 through oral agreement and paid ZW$280,000. In 2011, another court declared the sale agreement null as defendant fraudulently sold property that didn't belong to her. Plaintiff claimed US$15,000 balance after defendant paid US$5,000 restitution following criminal conviction. Defendant raised prescription as defense.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases