Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Chiwombererwa Patrick Mapfumo and Esther Mapfumo v Divvyland Investments (Private) Limited and Minister for Justice Legal & Parliamentary Affairs and David Chiweza

HH 501-22

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
21 July 2022
Citation
HH 501-22
Neutral Citation
[2022] ZWHH 501
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Bachi-Mzawazi J
Full Bench
Bachi-Mzawazi J
Areas of Law
Constitutional LawProperty LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
evictionconstitutional violationsection 56section 74occupation rightsdeed of donationarbitrary eviction
Tags
evictionconstitutional rightsproperty rightsoccupation rights
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment Act No. 20 of 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment Act No. 20 of 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment Act No. 20 of 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment Act No. 20 of 2013
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain a constitutional matter arising from a Supreme Court decision","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Supreme Court has made extant decision; applicants seek constitutional relief"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the practice of evicting \"all those claiming title through him\" without citing occupiers violates constitutional rights","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicants were not cited but affected by eviction order"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicants occupied house number 12 Le Roux Drive, Hillside, Harare under a deed of donation from the third respondent. The Supreme Court granted an eviction order against the third respondent and "all those claiming title through him" without citing the applicants. The applicants sought a constitutional declaratory relief arguing this violated their rights under sections 56 and 74 of the Constitution.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →