Chengetedzai Depository Company Limited v Securities and Exchange Commission of Zimbabwe and Zimbabwe Stock Exchange Limited and Minister of Finance and Economic Development
{"issue_text":"Whether SECZ acted ultra vires by issuing the directive under section 4 instead of section 118","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Directive issued under section 4 read with Schedule 1 paragraph 21"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the directive violated property rights under section 71(2) of the Constitution","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Directive facilitated migration of securities between depositories"}
{"issue_text":"Whether procedural fairness was observed in issuing the directive","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Limited consultation with stakeholders"}
{"issue_text":"Whether CDC had locus standi to champion rights of third parties","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"CDC sought to represent stakeholders and injured parties"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Chengetedzai Depository Company Limited (CDC), the sole licensed securities depository since 2014, challenged a directive issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Zimbabwe (SECZ) on 15 October 2021 that facilitated migration of securities from CDC to the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange Limited (ZSE). CDC alleged the directive was ultra vires and procedurally unfair.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases