Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Labour Court

Chengetai Mapundu v Zimbabwe Revenue Authority

[2013] ZWLC 41

Case Details

Court
Labour Court
Date
14 February 2013
Citation
[2013] ZWLC 41
Judgment No.
LC/H/41/13
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
G Musariri
Full Bench
G Musariri
Areas of Law
Labour lawPrescription
Keywords
prescriptionsalary stoppagelabour disputesection 94 Labour Act
Tags
prescriptionsalary disputelabour arbitration
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Labour Act
  • Labour Act
  • Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the matter was prescribed under section 94(1) of the Labour Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Salary stoppage 2007-08-30, referral 2011-10-05"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the matter was properly referred to a Labour Officer","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Referral process"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether an employer can unilaterally withdraw an employee's salary","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Salary stoppage by employer"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellant's salary was stopped by the respondent in August 2007. He referred the matter to a Labour Officer in October 2011, more than 4 years later. The Labour Court found the claim had prescribed under section 94(1) of the Labour Act.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →