sleeping on dutysafety rulessecurity guarddismissalmisconduct
Tags
disciplinary hearingmisconductsecurity guardsleeping on duty
legislation
Statutes Cited
National Employment Council for the Commercial Sectors Code of Conduct (NECCS Code)
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether sleeping on duty constitutes the offence of violating safety rules or measures with serious consequences under NECCS Code","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant slept on duty for 2 hours as security guard; property left unprotected"}
{"issue_text":"Whether employer had discretion to choose between multiple possible charges arising from same misconduct","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Same conduct could be charged as \"sleeping on duty\" or \"violating safety rules\""}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, a security guard employed by FBC Building Society, was found sleeping on duty for approximately two hours at a construction site on 14 December 2014. He was charged with violating safety rules under the NECCS Code and dismissed after disciplinary hearings. His appeals through domestic remedies were unsuccessful.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases