Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Charles Bukuta vs Justin Gokolo and Municipality of Chitungwiza

HH 258-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
26 April 2017
Citation
HH 258-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 258
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Makoni J
Full Bench
Makoni J
Areas of Law
Contract lawProperty lawPrescription
Keywords
Agreement of saleVacant possessionPrescriptionSpecific performanceProperty transfer
Tags
Property disputeVacant possessionSpecific performance
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Prescription Act
  • Prescription Act
  • Prescription Act
  • Prescription Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the claim has prescribed given that 12 years elapsed between the agreement date and filing","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Agreement date of 14 February 2002, application filing date of 27 June 2014"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant can institute proceedings for specific performance without giving proper notice under clause 5","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Clause 5 notice requirement, applicant's failure to give proper notice"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant Charles Bukuta purchased Stand No. 13424 Unit N Seke Chitungwiza from the first respondent Justin Gokolo through Twinpic Properties Private Limited for $130,000 on 14 February 2002. The agreement provided for vacant possession within 3 months, but the first respondent refused to give vacant possession. The applicant filed proceedings in 2014 seeking vacant possession and eviction.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →