Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 2) Act, 2021
Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the court can interdict constitutional bodies from exercising their constitutional functions","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Application sought to prescribe how JSC should make recommendations"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has locus standi to bring the application","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant is 27 years old, not a judge, acting in own interest"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the application is urgent","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"20-day delay between amendment and application"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
A 27-year-old Zimbabwean citizen brought an urgent application seeking to interdict the Judicial Service Commission and President from appointing Supreme Court and Constitutional Court judges without following the public interview process in s 180(4) of the Constitution, arguing that both sitting and non-sitting judges should be considered.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases