Central African Road Services (Private) Limited v Commissioner General of Zimbabwe Revenue Authority and Zimbabwe Revenue Authority and Stanbic Bank Zimbabwe Limited
{"issue_text":"Does delay in exercising lawful garnishee power violate constitutional right to prompt administrative action?","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"2.5 year delay between assessment and garnishee; no statutory time limit"}
{"issue_text":"Can an interdict issue against lawful conduct that has already occurred?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Monies already removed from accounts; garnishee completed"}
{"issue_text":"Did applicant establish prima facie right to interdict?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant conceded garnishee was lawful; no constitutional violation established"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought an interdict to prevent ZIMRA from garnishing its bank accounts for disputed tax assessments covering 2009-2012. Despite acknowledging the tax liability was not suspended by its appeal, the applicant argued ZIMRA's delay in garnishing created a legitimate expectation and violated constitutional rights to prompt administrative action.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases