Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Central African Building Construction Company (Pvt) Ltd v Jose Viera and Louis Viera

HH 172-11

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
22 July 2011
Citation
HH 172-11
Neutral Citation
[2011] ZWHH 172
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
Mutema J
Full Bench
Mutema J
Areas of Law
Company LawInterdict Relief
Keywords
company directorship disputenewspaper advertisementinterim interdictvindicatory proceedings
Tags
urgent applicationinterdictcompany directorshipadvertisement
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • s
  • w
  • e
  • r
  • e
  • c
  • i
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • h
  • i
  • s
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • .
  • #
  • #
  • #
  • O
  • T
  • H
  • E
  • R
  • A
  • U
  • T
  • H
  • O
  • R
  • I
  • T
  • I
  • E
  • S
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant has established a clear or prima facie right warranting interim interdict relief","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Advertisement contents were factual, pending litigation HC 109/07"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether there is well-grounded apprehension of irreparable harm","issue_type":"factual","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Single letter from Apex Design Architect, ZIMRA contract pending"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether balance of convenience favours granting the interdict","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Advertisement was factual, public interest in knowing litigation status"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The respondents, former owners of the applicant company, published an advertisement in The Herald newspaper stating that Danny Musukuma's entitlement to represent the company was subject to pending litigation. The applicant sought an urgent interdict claiming this harmed its business prospects, while respondents argued the advertisement was factual and in public interest.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →