{"issue_text":"Whether the appellant was unfairly dismissed for wilful absence from work","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant's absence periods, production of medical certificates, failure to apply for sick leave"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the medical certificates provided reasonable excuse for absence","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Medical certificates with discrepancies, timing of production"}
{"issue_text":"Whether appellant wilfully disobeyed lawful order to write report","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Refusal to write report, statement that it was unnecessary"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, employed by the respondent, was dismissed for wilful absence from work without applying for sick leave and for refusing to write a report explaining his absence. He produced medical certificates only after returning to work, which the disciplinary committee found unreliable due to discrepancies.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases