{"issue_text":"Whether the customary law union between the plaintiff and first defendant ended in 2003 or 2010","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Evidence of continued cohabitation, financial support, conjugal relations, birth of third child in 2007, final separation in 2010"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the Houghton Park house was acquired during the subsistence of the union","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"House purchased in October 2003 after reconciliation, proceeds from jointly owned Tynwald stand used"}
{"issue_text":"How the Houghton Park house should be shared between the parties","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Direct contributions of $18m by plaintiff and $22m by defendant, indirect contributions through household duties and child care"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the second defendant (Kuyeri Family Trust) owns the Houghton Park house","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Trust created after litigation commenced, no transfer of property to Trust, Trust created to shield property"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff and first defendant were in an unregistered customary law union from 1999 to 2010. During this period they acquired a house in Houghton Park, Harare. The first defendant claimed the union ended in 2003, while the plaintiff claimed it ended in 2010. The house was registered in the first defendant's name but the plaintiff claimed it was acquired through joint efforts under a tacit universal partnership.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases