DivorceCustodyMaintenanceMatrimonial propertyEquitable distribution
Tags
DivorceMatrimonial propertyMaintenanceCustody
legislation
Statutes Cited
N
o
s
t
a
t
u
t
e
s
w
e
r
e
c
i
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
i
s
j
u
d
g
m
e
n
t
.
T
h
e
c
o
u
r
t
r
e
l
i
e
d
e
n
t
i
r
e
l
y
o
n
c
o
m
m
o
n
l
a
w
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
a
n
d
p
r
e
c
e
d
e
n
t
.
#
#
#
O
T
H
E
R
A
U
T
H
O
R
I
T
I
E
S
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether House number 139 Villa Sol, Maputo constituted matrimonial property at the time of its sale","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Property registered in Defendant's name; transferred after divorce summons issued"}
{"issue_text":"What constitutes equitable distribution of the disputed property","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Property transferred during divorce proceedings"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties were married on 28 June 1991 and had three children. Plaintiff issued divorce summons on 20 September 2019 alleging irretrievable breakdown. The main dispute concerned whether House number 139 Villa Sol, Maputo constituted matrimonial property and its equitable distribution after it was transferred to a third party following divorce proceedings.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases