{"issue_text":"Does r 43(5) of Supreme Court Rules apply to applications for condonation and reinstatement of appeals?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Application sought both condonation and reinstatement"}
{"issue_text":"Does giving incorrect dies induciae render an application fatally defective?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicants gave 10 days instead of 3 days"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Applicants sought condonation for non-compliance with Supreme Court Rules and reinstatement of their appeal. The application was fatally defective because applicants gave respondents 10 days to oppose instead of the mandatory 3 days under r 43(5).
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases