employment contractsecondmentresignationBotswana work permits
legislation
Statutes Cited
N
o
n
e
–
n
o
s
t
a
t
u
t
e
i
s
m
e
n
t
i
o
n
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
j
u
d
g
m
e
n
t
.
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the respondent was unfairly dismissed or voluntarily resigned","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Email of 5 April 2011, work permits not granted, no notice given"}
{"issue_text":"Whether Breypik or Mapako was the employer","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Contract terms, secondment arrangement, marketing responsibilities"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent was employed as Procurement and Marketing Manager by Mapako (Pty) Ltd and was seconded to Breypik (Pvt) Ltd while based in Zimbabwe. He elected to work in Botswana but work permits were not granted. He wrote to Mapako directors indicating he was returning to Zimbabwe and handing over his duties. An arbitrator found he was unfairly dismissed and awarded benefits. The Labour Court found this constituted voluntary resignation.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases