{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant required leave to appeal against the relocation order","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Order involved custody and access rights"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the noting of appeal suspended the relocation order","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appeal noted on 25 March 2008"}
{"issue_text":"Whether access rights are an incidence of custody for appeal purposes","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant seeking to enforce access rights"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties were formerly married with two minor children. After their divorce, the respondent was awarded custody and the applicant was granted access rights. The respondent obtained an urgent order from GUVAVA J on 18 March 2008 allowing her to relocate with the children to the United Kingdom. The applicant noted an appeal against this order and sought urgent interim relief to prevent the respondent from removing the children from Zimbabwe pending the appeal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases