section 65(1) Constitutionfair labour practicescollective bargaining agreementprinciple of subsidiarityovertime payment
Tags
constitutional applicationlabour rightsfair labour practicesovertimecollective bargaining agreement
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Labour Act
Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicants' allegations of unfair labour practices raise a constitutional matter requiring interpretation of s 65(1) of the Constitution","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicants allege violation of right to fair and safe labour practices; Collective Bargaining Agreement exists; Labour Act provides remedies"}
{"issue_text":"Whether applicants can rely directly on Constitution without challenging legislation giving effect to constitutional right","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Labour Act and Collective Bargaining Agreement provide remedies for unfair labour practices"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
64 cross-border truck drivers employed by Cargo Carriers International Hauliers alleged unfair labour practices including forced long working hours without overtime pay and disciplinary action against workers who protested. They approached Constitutional Court directly under s 85(1)(a) claiming violation of s 65(1) right to fair and safe labour practices.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases