Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Bitcon (Private) Limited t/a Kuchi Construction v Two Penny Trading (Private) Limited

HH 363-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
9 June 2017
Citation
HH 363-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 363
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Mangota J
Full Bench
Mangota J
Areas of Law
Civil ProcedureContract LawPrescription
Keywords
Pre-trial conferenceAmendment of pleaSpecial pleaPrescription
Tags
ContractDebtPrescriptionAmendment of Pleadings
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Prescription Act
  • High Court Rules, 1971
  • High Court Rules, 1971
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant should be allowed to amend its plea to include a special plea of prescription","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Discovery of prescription at pre-trial conference, respondent's opposition"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether prescription can be raised at this stage of proceedings","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Section 20 of Prescription Act allows prescription at any stage"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant sought to amend its plea to include a special plea of prescription that was discovered during a pre-trial conference. The respondent opposed the amendment, arguing that prescription should have been raised earlier and that the real issue was whether payment was made for services rendered.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →