{"issue_text":"Whether respondent showed good cause for failure to file notice of opposition timeously as required by Rule 29(b)","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent filed 4 days late; claimed threats of violence caused office closure on 31 March and 1 April"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant filed an application for review and served the respondent, who was required to file a notice of opposition by 31 March 2025 but filed it on 4 April 2025 without applying for condonation. The applicant raised a preliminary point that the respondent was barred for non-compliance with Rule 29.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases