Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Beverley Mapuranga and Charles Tawona v Carson and Carson Real Estate (Pvt) Ltd and Ngoni Mawunga and Richard Kundarai Chiripamberi

[2023] ZWHH 149

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
23 February 2023
Citation
[2023] ZWHH 149
Judgment No.
149-23
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Chilimbe J
Full Bench
Chilimbe J
Areas of Law
Commercial litigationCivil procedureReal estate law
Keywords
exceptionrule compliancepreliminary objectioncommercial court rulespaginated bundle
Tags
real estatenegligenceprocedural complianceexception
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • 1
  • 9
  • 5
  • 0
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • e
  • (
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • e
  • s
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 7
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3
  • P
  • o
  • w
  • e
  • r
  • s
  • o
  • f
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • (
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • n
  • g
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • M
  • u
  • r
  • d
  • e
  • r
  • (
  • A
  • b
  • o
  • l
  • i
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • f
  • D
  • e
  • a
  • t
  • h
  • P
  • e
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • t
  • y
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6
  • 5
  • L
  • i
  • f
  • e
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • e
  • s
  • (
  • N
  • o
  • r
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • r
  • n
  • I
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • )
  • O
  • r
  • d
  • e
  • r
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1
  • L
  • i
  • f
  • e
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • e
  • s
  • (
  • E
  • n
  • g
  • l
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • W
  • a
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • )
  • R
  • u
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • P
  • r
  • i
  • s
  • o
  • n
  • R
  • u
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 9
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • p
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6
  • 8
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Does rule 12(2) require a party raising an exception to file a paginated and indexed bundle?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendants raised exception without filing bundle"}
  • {"issue_text":"Should the preliminary objection be upheld given mutual non-compliance with rules?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Both parties failed to observe court rules"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Plaintiffs sought compensation for loss from unsuccessful property transaction. First and second defendants raised an exception to the claim. Plaintiffs objected preliminarily that defendants failed to comply with rule 12(2) requiring a paginated and indexed bundle. The court upheld the preliminary objection and dismissed the exception for non-compliance with court rules.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →