Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Betty S. Chidziva v Jefas Marumbe & 24 Ors

HH 211-12

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
14 May 2012
Citation
HH 211-12
Neutral Citation
[2012] ZWHH 211
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
BERE J
Full Bench
BERE J
Areas of Law
Property lawInterdictsCivil procedure
Keywords
Farm occupationEvictionCriminal allegationsInterim relief
Tags
Farm evictionInterim interdictUrgent application
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Immigration Act 1971
  • British Nationality Act 1981
  • Immigration and Asylum Act 1999
  • Human Rights Act 1998
  • European Convention on Human Rights
  • Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
  • Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006
  • Immigration Rules
  • Common Travel Area provisions
  • Dublin Regulation
  • Qualification Directive
  • Procedures Directive
  • Reception Conditions Directive
  • Returns Directive
  • EU Charter of Fundamental Rights
  • Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
  • Treaty on European Union
  • Schengen Borders Code
  • Visa Code
  • Visa Information System Regulation
  • Eurodac Regulation
  • Dublin III Regulation
  • EURODAC Regulation
  • Asylum Procedures Regulation
  • Reception Conditions Directive
  • Qualification Directive
  • Temporary Protection Directive
  • Long-term Residents Directive
  • Family Reunification Directive
  • Students Directive
  • Researchers Directive
  • Blue Card Directive
  • Single Permit Directive
  • Employers Sanctions Directive
  • Seasonal Workers Directive
  • Intra-corporate Transferees Directive
  • Service Providers Directive
  • Posted Workers Directive
  • Freedom of Movement Directive
  • Citizens' Rights Directive
  • Return Directive
  • Frontex Regulation
  • EASO Regulation
  • EUAA Regulation
  • AMIF Regulation
  • ISF Regulation
  • BMVI Regulation
  • Dublin IV Regulation
  • EURODAC Recast Regulation
  • Screening Regulation
  • Asylum and Migration Fund Regulation
  • Integrated Border Management Fund Regulation
  • Internal Security Fund Regulation
  • Justice for Growth and Jobs Fund Regulation
  • Rights and Values Programme Regulation
  • Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values Programme Regulation
  • Creative Europe Programme Regulation
  • Erasmus+ Programme Regulation
  • Horizon Europe Programme Regulation
  • Digital Europe Programme Regulation
  • Connecting Europe Facility Regulation
  • InvestEU Regulation
  • Single Market Programme Regulation
  • European Defence Fund Regulation
  • European Peace Facility Regulation
  • Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument Regulation
  • Humanitarian Aid Regulation
  • Common Foreign and Security Policy Regulation
  • Common Security and Defence Policy Regulation
  • European Union Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime Regulation
  • European Union Magnitsky Act
  • European Union Global Magnitsky Act
  • European Union Human Rights Sanctions Regime
  • European Union Cyber Sanctions Regime
  • European Union Chemical Weapons Sanctions Regime
  • European Union Cyber Diplomacy Toolbox
  • European Union Cyber Defence Policy
  • European Union Cyber Security Strategy
  • European Union Cyber Resilience Act
  • European Union Cyber Security Act
  • European Union Network and Information Security Directive
  • European Union Cyber Security Directive
  • European Union Critical Infrastructure Protection Directive
  • European Union Terrorist Financing Directive
  • European Union Anti-Money Laundering Directive
  • European Union Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive
  • European Union Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Directive
  • European Union Country-by-Country Reporting Directive
  • European Union Automatic Exchange of Information Directive
  • European Union Savings Tax Directive
  • European Union Interest and Royalties Directive
  • European Union Parent-Subsidiary Directive
  • European Union Merger Directive
  • European Union Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base Directive
  • European Union Digital Services Tax Directive
  • European Union Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism Regulation
  • European Union Emissions Trading System Directive
  • European Union Effort Sharing Regulation
  • European Union Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry Regulation
  • European Union Renewable Energy Directive
  • European Union Energy Efficiency Directive
  • European Union Energy Performance of Buildings Directive
  • European Union Eco-Design Directive
  • European Union Energy Labelling Directive
  • European Union Tyre Labelling Regulation
  • European Union Fuel Quality Directive
  • European Union Renewable Energy in Transport Directive
  • European Union Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Directive
  • European Union Clean Vehicles Directive
  • European Union Euro Standards Regulation
  • European Union Industrial Emissions Directive
  • European Union Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Directive
  • European Union Waste Framework Directive
  • European Union Landfill Directive
  • European Union Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive
  • European Union Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive
  • European Union Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive
  • European Union Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals Regulation
  • European Union Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation
  • European Union Biocidal Products Regulation
  • European Union Plant Protection Products Regulation
  • European Union Food Contact Materials Regulation
  • European Union Toys Safety Directive
  • European Union General Product Safety Directive
  • European Union Product Liability Directive
  • European Union Consumer Rights Directive
  • European Union Unfair Commercial Practices Directive
  • European Union Unfair Contract Terms Directive
  • European Union Price Indication Directive
  • European Union Consumer Credit Directive
  • European Union Mortgage Credit Directive
  • European Union Payment Services Directive
  • European Union Electronic Money Directive
  • European Union Markets in Financial Instruments Directive
  • European Union Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive
  • European Union Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities Directive
  • European Union Solvency II Directive
  • European Union Capital Requirements Directive
  • European Union Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive
  • European Union Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation
  • European Union European Stability Mechanism Treaty
  • European Union Fiscal Compact Treaty
  • European Union European Semester Regulation
  • European Union Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure Regulation
  • European Union Excessive Deficit Procedure Regulation
  • European Union Stability and Growth Pact Regulation
  • European Union Euro Plus Pact
  • European Union Six-Pack
  • European Union Two-Pack
  • European Union European Fiscal Board Regulation
  • European Union Independent Fiscal Institutions Network Regulation
  • European Union European Systemic Risk Board Regulation
  • European Union Single Supervisory Mechanism Regulation
  • European Union Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation
  • European
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court should grant an interim interdict with general allegations and improperly framed orders","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Allegations were general not specific; orders sought would amount to eviction without proper process"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether urgent application is proper procedure for eviction","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Application sought eviction through urgent proceedings"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant Betty Chidziva brought an urgent application against 26 respondents alleging they were stealing, vandalising property and conducting themselves unlawfully on her plot. The application sought both interim and final orders to restrain the respondents. Four respondents appeared in person and denied the allegations, claiming they had legitimate rights to stay at the farm.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →