Betty Mabiza v Norwegian People's Aid

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Whether the Appeals Authority erred in finding appellant guilty of theft/fraud based on circumstantial evidence","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant was custodian of missing coupons; no direct evidence of theft"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether ground 5 (procedural irregularity) was a proper ground of appeal","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Ground 5 attacked procedure rather than decision"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether appellant's conviction for gross incompetence should stand when not appealed","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant only appealed theft/fraud conviction"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether penalty of dismissal should be interfered with","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No grounds of appeal addressed penalty"}

Background