unfair dismissaltrade union victimisationunregistered code of conductconstructive dismissalreinstatement
Tags
trade union victimisationunregistered code of conductconstructive dismissal
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act [Chapter 28:01]
Labour Act [Chapter 28:01]
Labour Act [Chapter 28:01]
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the appeal raises questions of law as required by Section 98(10) of the Labour Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"All grounds of appeal relate to factual findings"}
{"issue_text":"Whether dismissal based on unregistered Code of Conduct constitutes unfair dismissal","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant used unregistered Code of Conduct to discipline employees"}
{"issue_text":"Whether employees were victimised for trade union membership","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Employees were union members and were transferred after union formation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondents, who were employees of the appellant, claimed they were victimised for joining the Mining Workers Union of Zimbabwe and were constructively dismissed through imposition of intolerable working conditions. The appellant alleged the employees were dismissed for wilful disobedience after refusing transfer to another mine. The arbitrator found the dismissal unfair as it was based on an unregistered Code of Conduct.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases