Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Bulawayo High Court

Benny L. Moyo v Masiyephambili School Trust and Israel Ndlovu N.O.

HB 112/21

Case Details

Court
Bulawayo High Court
Date
24 June 2021
Citation
HB 112/21
Neutral Citation
[2021] ZWHB 112
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Dube-Banda J
Full Bench
Dube-Banda J
Areas of Law
Civil ProcedureContempt of Court
Keywords
contempt of courtrule 389point in liminecourt application defects
Tags
contempt of courtcivil procedurecourt rules compliance
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act, 2013
  • High Court Rules of Zimbabwe, 1971
  • High Court Rules of Zimbabwe, 1971
  • High Court Rules of Zimbabwe, 1971
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether a contempt application that fails to comply with rule 389 (requiring distinct statement of grounds) can be cured by rule 4C","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant conceded non-compliance with rule 389"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant sought to hold the respondents in contempt of a Labour Court judgment that had been registered with the High Court. The respondents took a point in limine that the contempt application failed to comply with rule 389 of the High Court Rules, which requires court applications to set forth distinctly the grounds of complaint.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →