Benard Wekare v The State and The Attorney General of Zimbabwe and Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation
Musangano Lodge (Pvt) Ltd t/a Musangano Lodge v The State and Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation
{"issue_text":"Whether sections 38B(1), 38C, 38D(2) and 38E(1)(h)(i) of Broadcasting Services Act infringe the constitutional right to protection from compulsory deprivation of property","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Licence fees compulsory and paid to ZBC general funds"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the licence fee provisions violate the right to protection of the law under section 18(1) of Constitution","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Definition of \"receiver\" and criminalization of possession"}
{"issue_text":"Whether licence requirement infringes freedom of expression under section 20(1) of Constitution","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Restriction on possession of receivers for broadcasting"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Two separate applicants challenged the constitutionality of provisions requiring payment of television licence fees to Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation, arguing they violated constitutional rights to property, protection of law, and freedom of expression.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases