fixed term contractssection 92F Labour Actquestion of lawprospects of success
Tags
fixed term contractsleave to appealquestion of law
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act
Labour Act
Labour Act
Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the grounds of appeal raise questions of law as required for appeal to Supreme Court","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"All grounds of appeal presented"}
{"issue_text":"Whether section 12B(3)(b) applies to workers on continuously renewed fixed term contracts","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicants employed on fixed term contracts continuously renewed"}
{"issue_text":"Whether reference to Statutory Instrument 15/2006 in relation to fixed term contracts was proper","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Court relied on SI 15/2006 in concluding fixed term contracts acceptable"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Appellants sought leave to appeal to Supreme Court after Labour Court dismissed their appeal. They were employees on fixed term contracts continuously renewed for 2-9 years. When respondent subcontracted work, they refused contracts from new company. Court found most grounds raised factual issues, not questions of law.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases