Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Supreme Court

BARIADIE INVESTMENTS (PRIVATE) LIMITED v (1) PUWAYI CHIUTSI (2) TENDAI MASHAMANDA (3) THE REGISTRAR OF DEEDS (4) THE SHERIFF OF THE HIGH COURT (5) ELIOT ROGERS

SC 24/22

Case Details

Court
Supreme Court
Date
15 February 2022
Citation
SC 24/22
Neutral Citation
[2022] ZWSC 24
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
GWAUNZA DCJ
Full Bench
GWAUNZA DCJGUVAVA JABHUNU JA
Areas of Law
Property lawCivil procedureExecution of judgments
Keywords
Sheriff's saleDeed of transferFraudulent conveyancePignus judicialeJudicial attachmentExecution
Tags
Property lawFraudulent transferExecution salePignus judicialeJudicial attachment
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Supreme Court Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in dismissing the application for cancellation of Deed of Transfer No.708/19","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Property was judicially attached and sold to appellant; first respondent fraudulently sold to second respondent"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether a pignus judiciale was created over the property","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Property was attached in execution and sold by Sheriff"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether second respondent was innocent purchaser","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Second respondent aware of caveats on title deed"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The first respondent, a legal practitioner, fraudulently sold property that had already been judicially attached and sold to the appellant through a confirmed Sheriff's sale. He perjured himself to facilitate transfer to the second respondent, despite multiple court orders confirming the execution sale to the appellant.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →