Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Barclays Bank of Zimbabwe Limited v Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe and University of Zimbabwe

HH 477-13

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
29 October 2013
Citation
HH 477-13
Neutral Citation
[2013] ZWHH 477
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Zhou J
Full Bench
Zhou J
Areas of Law
Civil ProcedureBanking Law
Keywords
third party joinderforeign currency accountsbanking directivesindemnitycontribution
Tags
third party joinderforeign currency accountsbanking directives
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, 1971
  • State Liabilities Act
  • State Liabilities Act
  • Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether an application for third party joinder under Order 14 Rule 93 constitutes a \"claim for money\" requiring 60 days notice under the State Liabilities Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Application filed without 60 days notice; Reserve Bank objects on this ground"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the joinder application has prescribed","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Application filed after main action commenced; prescription defence raised"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Barclays Bank sought to join the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe as a third party in proceedings where the University of Zimbabwe claimed US$6.4 million from foreign currency accounts that Barclays had transferred to the Reserve Bank pursuant to directives issued in 2007 and 2009. Barclays claimed entitlement to indemnity from the Reserve Bank.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →