arbitral award registrationcurrency denominationcontract breachcoal fines supply
Tags
arbitrationcontractcurrencycommercial dispute
legislation
Statutes Cited
Arbitration Act
Arbitration Act
Finance Act (No. 2 of 2019)
Prescription Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award should be registered despite being denominated in US dollars","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Contract specified US dollar payment; currency laws changed during contract period"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the award violated public policy by breaching currency regulations","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Finance Act No. 2 of 2019 and related instruments restricted foreign currency use"}
{"issue_text":"Whether ordering payment before delivery was a palpable irregularity","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Contract required delivery before payment obligation arose"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought to enforce an arbitral award of US$815,000 against the respondent for breach of a coal fines supply contract. The respondent opposed registration, arguing the award violated public policy by denominated in US dollars contrary to Zimbabwe's currency laws.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases