Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Augustus Close Holdings (Private) Limited v Taxing Officer and The Farmakas Trust and Antony Antoniou and Paidamoyo Kurunere and Carol Hobbart and John George Sampson and City of Harare and Director of Works

HH 668-25

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
27 October 2025
Citation
HH 668-25
Neutral Citation
[2025] ZWHH 668
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Review

Bench

Presiding
DEME J
Full Bench
DEME J
Areas of Law
Civil ProcedureCosts LawContract Law
Keywords
taxation of costscompromise agreementconsentbill of costsreviewRule 72
Tags
taxation of costscompromise agreementconsent judgmentreview application
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, 2021
  • High Court Rules, 2021
  • High Court Rules, 2021
  • High Court Rules, 2021
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether a decision for bill of costs reached through consent of parties and endorsed by the taxing officer can be set aside by application for review","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Parties reached compromise agreement on costs; applicant consented to taxation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant sought review of a taxing officer's decision to tax a bill of costs in its favour despite no court order granting such costs. The parties had reached a compromise agreement on costs, which the applicant later sought to challenge through review proceedings.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →