retrenchmentaudi alteram partemsection 12C Labour Actright to be heard
Tags
administrative reviewnatural justiceright to be heard
legislation
Statutes Cited
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
A
c
t
1
9
7
2
M
e
r
c
h
a
n
t
S
h
i
p
p
i
n
g
A
c
t
1
9
8
8
S
u
p
r
e
m
e
C
o
u
r
t
A
c
t
1
9
8
1
C
r
o
w
n
P
r
o
c
e
e
d
i
n
g
s
A
c
t
1
9
4
7
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the Minister's approval of retrenchment without hearing applicants on package quantum constituted a reviewable irregularity","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicants confined submissions to locus standi; Minister approved based on papers before him"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the Minister was required to await the arbitrator's decision on employer identity","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator's decision came after Minister's approval"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants sought review of the Minister's approval of their retrenchment by the curator of Trust Bank Corporation Limited, arguing they were denied the right to be heard on the quantum of their retrenchment package while the identity of their proper employer was sub judice before an arbitrator.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases