Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2000
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2001
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2002
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2003
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2004
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2005
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2006
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2007
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2008
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2009
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2010
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2011
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2012
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2013
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2014
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2015
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2016
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2017
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2018
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2019
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2020
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2021
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2022
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2023
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2024
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2025
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2026
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2027
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2028
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2029
Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2030
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the application is properly before the Constitutional Court as a direct application under s 85(1)(a)","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"High Court previously dismissed urgent application on same subject matter"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the cause of action is res judicata","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Same parties, same relief sought, earlier High Court judgment extant"}
{"issue_text":"Whether applicant has substituting non-constitutional remedy under Administrative Justice Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Administrative Justice Act provides remedies for administrative action"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, a mining company, challenged the government's declaration that its Special Grants 4765 and 5247 for diamond mining were void. The government consolidated all diamond mining activities in Chiadzwa, ordering the applicant to cease operations immediately.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases