condonationlate noting of appealspecial grantspoliation ordermining operationsConstitutional Court
Tags
condonationlate appealspoliationmining rightsspecial grant
legislation
Statutes Cited
Mines and Minerals Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether applicant should be granted condonation for late noting of appeal","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Delay of 2 years 3 months, filing of Constitutional Court application"}
{"issue_text":"Whether applicant has reasonable prospects of success on appeal","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Court a quo failed to deal with spoliation issue, focused on substantive rights"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, a mining company operating under a Special Grant in Chiadzwa District since 2009, was evicted from its mining operations on 22 February 2016 when the first respondent declared its special grant expired. The applicant filed an urgent chamber application in the High Court seeking restoration of status quo ante, which was dismissed on 30 March 2016. The applicant then filed a Constitutional Court application before seeking condonation for late appeal to the Supreme Court.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases